On the other hand, when copying a large amount of smaller files, TeraCopy seems to have the edge. Our test wasn’t anywhere near scientific, but we did our best to make sure we could rule out interference while still trying to emulate some real-world use. Your mileage may vary, of course, as there are quite a few variables at play here. The numbers were all over the place, so lets take a look at why they might be the way they are.įirst and foremost, since we are using mechanical drives and not solid-state storage, seek times and the like come into effect. #Teracopy portable full#Ĭopying a single large file can be a simple matter or a complicated one, depending on whether the file is in contiguous area or split up and written in the gaps on a fairly full drive. The same thing applies when considering multiple-file operations. Essentially, you can consider single large files and multiple smaller files to be two separate types of copy operations depending on your hardware.Īnother thing to look at is the fact that TeraCopy has an arguable advantage over SuperCopier in that it has 64-bit support. #Teracopy portable update#īoth programs are also a little out of date - TeraCopy hasn’t had an update in a year, and SuperCopier’s last version was in 2009. TeraCopy has a nice list of features, which we’ve covered before.
0 kommentar(er)
